|
As IT consulting/staffing reached peak levels in the 1980’s, many companies began to seek a more efficient way to manage their temporary IT workforce and the numbers of IT services suppliers. Managers were inundated with vendor contacts, calls and meeting requests; and in some cases, corruption and kickbacks forced change.
By law, federal, state and local agencies were and are required to compile vendor lists based on a competitive bid process. While this is one way to maintain cost control to a degree, it does little to address the way in which staffing needs are fulfilled.
To address the broader goal of managing the contingent workforce process, Vendor Management Systems, or VMS’s, began to appear it the late 1980’s and early 1990’s. Simply stated, the VMS role was to produce cost efficient, high quality temporary IT staffing with faster turnaround times. Ideally, Vendor Management Systems were to:
- Gain more control of the IT staffing vendor base
- Consolidate the number of vendors
- Reduce costs
- Create an equal playing ground for all vendors
- Optimize manpower utilization
- Reduce time spent by hiring managers on managing the relationship.
Reducing costs are certainly a motivating force in clients implementing VMS; vendors are often told their costs will go down as well. In actuality, most vendors’ costs increase. Sales costs remain constant but recruiting costs increase to accommodate lower fill ratios. Administrative costs increase due to processing more candidates. Many VMS contracts contain discount programs for no fee employee conversion, early pay, etc. Finally, VMS costs are usually passed on the vendors, averaging 2% to 5%.
By definition, VMS reduces contact with hiring managers. Vendors are limited when trying to define the right corporate, team and individual personality mix to select the ideal candidate from a field of seemingly potential fits. Some limit the time a job order is open, usually 24-48 hours; others limit the number of resumes an individual vendor can submit or the total per job order. Because of reduced contact between vendors and hiring managers; interview feedback is often delayed if given at all.
VMS is here to stay, that’s for certain. However, the keys to successful VMS’s are communication, feedback, communication, flexibility, communication and cooperation. Oh, did I mention communication? Together with an ongoing review format, VMS will serve as a valued tool to client, vendor and consultant alike.
For more information on VMS, go to www.naacb.org.
What are your thoughts on VMS?
|